Much has been written over the last three years about Syria and the Syrian Government and most of it has emanated from Washington. How much of it is honest reporting and how much is simply political propaganda on the part of the USA?
Well, from a distance it is often difficult to sift the wheat from the chaff so to speak. Not with-standing the difficulty however, the operation of true democracy can only be achieved by the public being able to access both sides to a story. Most governments are not comfortable with this scenario however because they prefer to disseminate only that version which suits their respective national and economic needs.
How does all of this, however, have anything to do with Syria.
Well, in the case of Syria, the relevance is simply this. It enables the USA and its European allies to conspire to aid Qatar and Saudi Arabia to break Germany’s and Poland’s reliance upon Russian Gas and Oil supplies to the West.
Qatar has an abundance of gas supplies but can only get its gas to Europe by the construction of a pipeline through southern Syria to the Mediterranean Sea. It cannot and will not go through Israel or Egypt. The Syrian Government will not permit this as it relies upon Russia and Syria opposes, no, vehemently opposes islamic fundamentalism. The USA has never forgiven the Russian government of Vladimir Putin from preventing the attempts of George Soros and his notorious Quantum Fund from attempting to take over the Russian Gas Fields which are the largest known gas reserves in the world.
AH you may exclaim, At Last! The real reason emerges behind the USA’s concerted efforts to bring down the Syrian Government. But isn’t that always the hidden reason in all US foreign policy? Well that is for you to decide. Our job is simply to provide you with the other side to the story
We will be writing a series of articles on Syria, the nature of its government and the politics of the B’aathist Party together with the historical background to Muslim Fundamentalism in Syria and additionally an explanation of the differences between the principal Islamic sects in Syria and the Christian communities both within Syria and in neighbouring Lebanon and Iraq.
It is becoming increasing obvious to today’s world, that unless our public understands this, they will never understand why Islamic Fundamentalism or orthodoxy poses such a great danger to our way of life and the very fabric of our society, both here in Australia and in the western world in general.
Where does this leave the youth of nations such as Australia, The USA and The United Kingdom?
Well, they invariably are the ones who must lay down their lives in the often-military campaigns that ensue but are almost always kept in the dark as to the real reasons for their government’s engaging in military intervention in the affairs of other sovereign nations but often, do not get access to the true facts of the matter which would enable them to reach a rational conclusion on whether intervention can be justified or not.
In fact, the under thirties, often, do not even vote in national elections in their respective countries. Perhaps the worst examples of this are the USA, United Kingdom and Australia. Strangely enough, New Zealand appears to be the odd man out in this equation but we are unable to determine exactly why this is so.
The United States regularly has approximately twenty-five per cent of eligible voters participate in Federal Elections whilst the United Kingdom enjoys in the region of forty per cent. Australia, with compulsory voting, enjoys in the region of ninety-seven per cent. The results of all three however are invariably the same. The under thirties simply turn off or do not vote at all. Even in Australia, when the Australian figures for voter participation are compared with birth records and the resultant figures of the over eighteens who are eligible to vote, the results are alarming. We will deal with this factor in a future series of articles.
As a result, New Zealand excepted, the usual reaction of today’s younger generation is to simply turn off and proceed to do their own thing.
Tragically, that is their big mistake because that is exactly what society’s current masters want them to do.
What can we do, is the oft heard cry? Government never listens in any case to what the younger generation must say. A few of the smarter well educated younger generation who know how to work the system to their own advantage, join one party or another and simply go with the flow, knowing that they will eventually be noticed and when it becomes time to replace the retiring candidates, they simply seek party support to be selected to replace those who are standing down.
Well sadly, this line of self-interested action on behalf of the select few do absolutely nothing to alleviate the increasingly dire straits of the overwhelming numbers of disadvantaged within our society.
What is clearly needed is action by the younger generation to rectify this disgrace, but again, we hear the voice of the younger generation crying out, but what can we do to change this? Nothing?
This is quite wrong. When you whisper, government cannot hear you and assumes that you are submissive. When you roar, government recoils….
But…when the younger generation roar with regularity and discipline, the ruling minority becomes concerned and when the younger generation takes to the streets and surrounds government buildings and Parliament, provided they do not allow disruptive elements from either within or without to incite violence, they invariably will win out.
What they never ever seem to do is organise themselves into an effective political lobby and this, if properly constituted, is the most effective weapon of all. However, the disadvantaged youth within society today do not have sufficient education to achieve this and this assists the major political parties to continually share government and so it goes on and on.
There is an old saying in western politics. The demonstrators may be out there in large numbers today but they will quickly tire of this in a day or two and they are usually right but when organised discipline and leadership replaces undisciplined rabble, government becomes quickly rattled and begins to make tactical errors. In some cases, they even resort to police action to disperse crowds but this invariably only offers two outcomes, temporary dispersal or public reaction at the ballot box. There is however another, sparsely utilised strategy but we will discuss this in a later edition of the Chronical.
Stay tuned in…